Arctic's Den

I think I need to make some new icons, now that this has become the Sandpit of Whine and Rant.

In the meantime, here are the Dos and Don'ts of selling music to me over the internet, but because I'm in more of a Whine mood, the Don'ts come first.

( Read more... )

Ever heard of Arthur Daley's Clearance Houses? They're places where the larger chain stores send their junk to be flogged at a low price. The one in Melbourne is poorly ventilated and cramped, but occasionally you can find some pretty good deals on books and CDs. Case in point - at the moment there rare several racks of CDs at $5 each, or 4 for $10. Granted, most of the albums are complete and utter rubbish, but look what I found yesterday:

Black Rebel Motorcycle Club - B.R.M.C.
The Corrs - Talk on Corners [Special Edition]
The Corrs - In Blue [Special Edition]
Depeche Mode - Ultra
The Human League - Hysteria
Pulp - We Love Life
Revenge - One True Passion
Various Artists - Hope (War Child album for Iraq)

I initially purchased the Cardigans' Gran Turismo, but someone had stolen the CD from its case, so I returned and exchanged it for Human League.

If you have no idea who Revenge are, don't worry. It's a side project by New Order bass player Peter Hook. It's the only album they released, and it's rather bad. However, it's also incredibly rare, and it only cost me $2.50, of course. Don't like the booklet art - the sexual objectification of women in the photos is something I'd expect from a lesser band. The store successfully hid this from me by putting the booklet in backwards, with the least offensive photo showing.

The War Child album was bought for the sole purpose of acquiring New Order's cover of Jimmy Cliff's "Vietnam", which can't be found anywhere else, and is a lot of fun. But I expect to be pleasantly surprised by some of the other tracks on the record.

The Corrs, well ... a bit of a guilty pleasure there. Some of their songs are too sugar-sweet for me to handle, but they don't sound like anyone else in pop music, and that's pretty unusual.

While none of these albums would make it with me to a desert island (though the Pulp one's pretty good), getting all that for $20 was worth the 45 minutes I spent hurting my wrists flicking through all that junk.

A while ago I was trying to think up some kind of theme or purpose, or coherent idea that could define this LJ. Didn't work, so I gave in and decided it would become my sandpit.

Hence, more whining about bands to which I listen. (Well, I think the Billy Corgan one was a valid complaint, really.)

Bloc Party, who I like quite a bit - not love, just like quite a bit - have failed with the release of their non-album single, "One More Chance". Actually, it's probably their record label that was being incredibly frustrating, but either way:

1) "One More Chance" appeared on the internet as a video on MTV's website, and the song streamed on the Bloc Party site. Nothing wrong with that, except that this happened over a month before the song was available to purchase. Now, if that's not begging people to make illegal downloads, I don't know what is. This is the age of instant consumption - if someone hears a song they like, they want it now. We can have a lengthy discussion on the sociology behind this, but it's how it is, and it won't be changing any time soon.

2) Now that 10 August has come and gone and the song's finally been released, where can I buy it online? Well, only in the iTunes store. Not on Sandbag, which is the official Bloc Party site for song downloads, only iTunes.

Sorry, I don't have iTunes on my computer, not because I don't have an Mac or an iPod, but because iTunes is one of the most overrated pieces of software around. The interface is far more clunky than people seem to realise - I have yet to find a single advantage it has over Windows Media Player.

The Sandbag site is so easy: click on song / album, enter credit card details, download as MP3. No further software requirements needed! It's how downloading music should be. Radiohead's W.A.S.T.E. site is similar, only they send you an e-mail which has a link to the music file.

Considering the way in which Bloc Party's last album, Intimacy was released (first single, then most of the rest of the album available for download, then the second single added on, and bonus tracks for those who ordered the CD as well), I can't imagine this was the band's doing. That means it's probably yet another record company having to learn the hard way that the way people consume music just can't be controlled like in the 'good old days' before the internet.

I am never buying anything by Billy Corgan / Smashing Pumpkins again.

That's a big statement to make, given that the first CD I ever owned was the 1998 album Adore, and that the Pumpkins would have been in my top five favourite bands from about late 1997 to somewhere around the beginning of 2005. However, the behaviour of singer Billy Corgan and the general quality of the band's music has deteriorated rapidly since he and drummer Jimmy Chamberlin reformed the band a couple of years ago.

( Read more... )

*dance*

The Greens won the Fremantle by-election! 

This is one of the greatest victories of any Green party in Australia. To put it in perspective:

* This was the highest primary vote the Greens have ever achieved in a single-member electorate at state or federal level: 44% compared to the ALP's 38%. The winning margin was  54% - 46%, which is quite comfortable all things considered. We won booths which historically have been solid Labor for generations. In fact, Labor held Fremantle for over 80 years until last weekend.

* With the exception of Tasmania and the ACT, where they have multi-member electorates, the Greens have never won a seat in the lower house of a state or territory. (We did have two defections: Kris Hanna in SA and Ronan Lee from QLD - both were sitting Labor MPs.)

* The Greens now have 5 MPs in the WA parliament, giving them party status. This means they will have more resources, and influence. With 7 MPs across state and federal levels, WA now has more Greens in parliament than any other state or territory. Tasmania is second with 6 (4 state, 2 federal).

And now ... the future. Four state elections and one federal election will take place over the next two years.

* SA and Tasmania go to the polls in March 2010. At the moment we have on MP in SA's upper house, and we would hope to increase this to two. Tasmania has 4 MPs - the aim will be to add another one or two.

* A federal election will most likely take place in July or August 2010. Here the Greens have a chance to pick up some more Senate seats (up to 5 new ones, dependent on a number of factors), and have another tilt at capturing inner-city seats like Melbourne and Sydney.

* Then we have Victoria in November 2010. Here is the next big chance for Greens to take lower house seats from the ALP: the inner-city electorates of Melbourne, Brunswick and Richmond only require small swings to go Green. There are also plenty of opportunities to increase the numbers in the upper house from the current 3 MPs in both city and country areas.

* Lastly, there's NSW in March 2011. Anyone who has been following NSW politics lately will know that neither the ALP or the Liberals are particularly favoured at the moment. This is a chance not only for the Greens to increase their MPs in the upper house from 4 to 5, but also to target the inner-city seats of Balmain and Marrickville.

Of course there will be disappointments ahead; times when our vote drops and we lose MPs. But just now, it is damn good to be Green.

Part one of my project to re-read and review Thomas Hardy's fourteen novels. Beware of spoilers!

The post is in hardy_fans.

Over the last few decades, a bizarre pattern has developed in US Presidential politics; namely, that left-handers are popping up more than they should statistically. Five of the last seven US Presidents are/were left-handed: Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., Bill Clinton, Barack Obama. Reagan was left-handed by birth but forced to convert to his right hand back in ye not-so-olden days when being left-handed was very much frowned upon. That just leaves Jimmy Carter and George Bush Jr. as the only two right-handers since Richard Nixon.

No more than 10% of Americans (this holds true in many countries) are left-handed, so you'd say that lately, left-handers are getting a pretty good deal where the US Presidency is concerned.

The most spectacular example of this was in the 1992 election, where not only were both main candidates (Bush Sr. and Clinton) left-handed, but Ross Perot, the independent outsider who ended up winning 18.9% of the vote, was also a lefty.

If George Bush Jr. hadn't stolen the 2000 election, the streak of left-handed Presidents would have continued, because Al Gore is, you guessed it, left-handed. Not to mention that the Americans had another chance to elect a left-hander in 2004 - a certain Democrat named John Kerry.

With left-handed President Obama, it seems things have been restored to their "natural" state. Not that voting for John McCain would have kept the status quo: he's left-handed too.

In fact, the last time a presidential race was run where both the Democratic and Republican nominees were right-handed was back in 1972, when Richard Nixon defeated George McGovern.

Click here to go to my post in the Hardy_Fans community

I am very pleased to report, following up on my earlier post on this matter, that the proposal by the Madagascan government to sign away over a million hectares of land (half of the island's fertile soil) on a 99-year lease to Daewoo for the growth of corn which would then be exported to South Korea, has been cancelled due to outrage from the Madagascan people.

http://www.theage.com.au/world/land-grab-in-africa-falters-20090115-7i61.html

Happy New Year everyone!

But that's where the cheer ends for this post.

The front page of the November 28 – December 4 edition of the Guardian Weekly had an article with the headline “Rich world buys rights to the fields of the poor” followed up with a further two pages of case studies. It was one of the most surprising and distressing things I'd read all year.

Here is a version of the main article:

www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/nov/22/food-biofuels-land-grab

In a nutshell, high-income countries and multinational corporations are buying up enormous amounts of land from mostly low-income countries in order to grow crops and thereby secure their own food supplies.

Some examples:

* Daewoo Logistics from South Korea is taking out a 99-year lease on over a million hectares of land in Madagascar in order to grow millions of tonnes of corn a year.

* A number of Chinese companies are growing crops on over 1.2 million hectares of land in the Phillippines.

* Sudan has made around 900,000 hectares available to foreign investors.

* Cambodia is talking to countries including Kuwait and Qatar about leasing millions of hectares.

* A consortium of Saudi Arabian investors are planning to grow rice for export back to Saudi on 500,000 hectares of land in Indonesia.

* 15% of land in Laos has been leased to a variety of foreign investors.

* An investment company from the United Arab Emirates is currently looking to buy around 400,000 hectares in a number of countries, including Australia.

( Read more... )

I'm not surprised, just furious.

Today Prime Minster Kevin Rudd and the Minister for Climate Change, Penny Wong, announced that if the current round of climate talks in Poland are successful in reaching some kind of substantial agreement (good luck figuring out what that's supposed to mean), Australia will commit to cutting emissions by 15% of 1990 levels by the year 2020. If no satisfactory agreement is reached, Australia will only cut emissions by 5% by 2020.

The world's top scientists say we need a worldwide emissions cut of 40% by 2020 to avoid runaway climate change. Indeed, if we keep going the way we are, that number may only increase. The Arctic is set to be free of ice in the summer within the next five or so years.

Since Australia "only" contributes 1% of carbon emissions (we emit an enormous amount per capita, though), 5% of that is 0.05% of global emissions. And we live in a country which is one of the best-equipped to benefit from renewable energy.

When the ALP said during the 2007 election campaign that they would do "something" to combat climate change, I was very sceptical that this would end up being little more than lip-service. Some would have accused me of being cynical. Today, unfortunately, I have been proved right.

And the worst part? While there will be some cash put into developing renewable energy, billions of dollars will be handed to the coal industry and other big polluters to "compensate" for this paltry 5% cut in emissions they'll have to undertake.

How will the ALP get this through the Senate? Well, the Greens obviously will want a much higher target than that; so, I imagine, would Nick Xenophon. And who knows what Family First Senator Steve Fielding thinks these days? But Rudd won't have to deal with any of them; I'm sure the Liberals would be more than happy to vote for the bill as they probably would have come up with a similar plan had they been forced to act on climate change while still in office.

Labor, Liberal - it's all the same.

 

P.S. If you're as furious as I am and want to do something about it - the Australian Greens anticipated this failure and have organised protests in all capital cities tomorrow. See the link below for more information:

http://bob-brown.greensmps.org.au/climatechangeaction

The Victorian parliament currently has two controversial bills before it. One (Abortion Reform Bill) proposes to take abortion out of the Crimes Act; the other (Medical Treatment (Physician Assisted Dying) Bill) seeks to legislate for euthanasia. Both will be subject to a conscience vote by all the parties, meaning that the end result could go either way.

My position on these bills is that they shouldn't be controversial – I support both.

On this post, I'm going to keep a list of how the MPs intend to vote on these two bills, updated as frequently as possible. The information is based upon Hansard, the media, and other sources. If you know of the positions of any MPs listed as “unknown”, or if I've put an MP in the wrong category, please let me know and I'll alter it appropriately.

Abortion Reform Bill: last updated Friday 12 September - For = 48, Against = 35, Unknown = 5. BILL HAS PASSED LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY UNAMENDED.

The bill then passed the Legislative Council unamended in early October. The final vote was For = 23, Against = 17.

Medical Treatment (Physician Assisted Dying) Bill: last updated Thursday 11 September - For = 13, Against = 25, Abstentions = 2. BILL DEFEATED

( Read more... )

My life isn't all about literature; there's lots and lots of politics as well. Since I arguably spend more time on political matters than literary ones, it made sense that my LJ would at least attempt to reflect that as well. So, an expanded sub-title and a new journal theme later (not sure how much I like it, though), and here we go again!

Click here to go to my post in the Hardy_Fans community

For reasons quite possibly related to my perfectionist streak, which various teachers and lecturers have carefully nurtured over the years, I tend to begin writing projects on the first day of a month. So I'm not surprised to find myself here on 1 August 2008, finally posting something on my LiveJournal account.

One of my great interests in life is literature, and not just any literature - great literature! (Note the sub-title of this journal. That's what an MA in English Language and Literature can do to you; aspiring students beware.) So that's where I'll be meandering for most of the posts on this journal. I have strong opinions on literary matters, but deep down I know all too well that art is subjective, so feel free to disagree with me as much as you like in the comments section. While I may have a slight tendency to go for the jugular in political disagreements, I am far more friendly in the world of letters.

Beyond that, I'm sure I'll find other topics to fill the void from time to time. Happy reading!